Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica Digilux3; Early Pix, User Inputs?
From: firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin)
Date: Sat Nov 18 19:51:37 2006
References: <auto-000325561028@fe-3.cluster1.bresnan.net> <8cdb18ed9ef8208b268762395ecf0a4b@comcast.net> <8c8849060611181835r246df877g3ac3a011d8647f85@mail.gmail.com>

Way to opinionated: it is unacceptable to you and probably many  
others, but its likely to be around the noise of the E-500 and I find  
that usable in situations where I would otherwise not get an image.  
Here for example at 800: noise yes, useless and unacceptable is up to  
the observer.

On 19/11/2006, at 13:35, Jerry Justianto wrote:

> The ISO above 400 is unacceptable.
>
> JSJ
>
> On 11/16/06, Bob Shaw <rsphotoimages@comcast.net> wrote:
>> Saw and handled this camera at the recent Seattle area Leica  
>> Akademie.
>>
>> Thing I really liked was - interchangeable lenses - and an optional
>> adaptor for Leica R lenses.
>>
>> And of course there will be other DigiLux 3 lenses to follow in 2007.
>> Larger sensor with larger pixels with CMOS LIve chip hence way fewer
>> noise issues due to heat buildup.
>>
>> Not Solms-built APO or Asph glass, but also not your Solms prices but
>> commendable optics for the the sensor at a more affordable price  
>> point.
>>
>> So:  any images out there, any owner (not website/magazine) reports?
>>
>> Thank you .
>>
>> Bob in Seattle.

Replies: Reply from jsjgroups at gmail.com (Jerry Justianto) ([Leica] Leica Digilux3; Early Pix, User Inputs?)
In reply to: Message from lkhermann at bresnan.net (lkhermann) ([Leica] Brightness of M8 viewfinder)
Message from rsphotoimages at comcast.net (Bob Shaw) ([Leica] Leica Digilux3; Early Pix, User Inputs?)
Message from jsjgroups at gmail.com (Jerry Justianto) ([Leica] Leica Digilux3; Early Pix, User Inputs?)