Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tina it was useful though, in that discriminating LUG eyes readily detected the difference. A vote for primes, as you say. Cheers Hoppy -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Tina Manley Sent: Wednesday, 22 November 2006 10:49 To: Leica Users Group Subject: [Leica] False alarm on the Canon 24/1.4 LUG: I went back and looked at the complete EXIF info for the shot that I posted on the Vegetable Market and it turns out that it was the 16-35 @ 24. I had just looked at the "24" and assumed it was the 24/1.4. It makes more sense that it was the 16-35. That's why the 24/1.4 wasn't giving the same poor results on the 5D. I should stick with primes and forget the zooms. Sorry, I should also try to keep better records of which lens I'm using :-( That will never happen. Tina Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA http://www.tinamanley.com _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information