Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:High ISOs Comparison
From: faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman)
Date: Wed Dec 6 07:21:55 2006
References: <021801c71945$db9ebe40$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <002301c71948$8bbcbb90$6401a8c0@FrankDell2>

bummer. no competition.

I was hoping the M8 would at least come close.

Eric

On 12/6/06, Frank Filippone <red735i@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> You can not tell the falloff from these images.....there is a single light
> source, therefore there IS falloff.  Square law or
> something like that.
>
> You need a constant lighted source to tell falloff... properly illuminated
> wall, piece of sky, etc.
>
> I do not care what kind or size of chip is inside..... the resultant
> comparative image is the issue ( somewhat paraphrasing AA).
> Your customer ( even if it is your wife/husband/yourself....) does not
> care.  Little Dora Sue looks better to her in  the Canon
> image.
>
> Frank Filippone
> red735i@earthlink.net
>
>
> Apples and oranges completely. But you are comparing a FF CMOS chip to a
> non FF CCD chip. The Canon 24/1.4 looks like it has allot
> of falloff on the edges, even at 5.6.
>
> Of course seeing it on a screen and seeing in print are another story.
>
> Chris
>
> -----
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:High ISOs Comparison)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Re:High ISOs Comparison)