Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] High ISOs Comparison
From: images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley)
Date: Wed Dec 6 06:58:52 2006
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20061206085853.025bd838@infoave.net> <001101c71944$bdc763a0$6401a8c0@FrankDell2>

At 09:42 AM 12/6/2006, you wrote:
>The amount of "noise" in the M8 is significantly higher, however, 
>the sharpness favors the Leica.  This could be the 24 F1.4 lens vs
>the 21 F2.8 lens compromises.....  The Leica lens could be just plain 
>sharper.

Yes, that's it.  The 24/1.4 is a great Canon L lens - $1,195 more or 
less but it doesn't compare to the Leica 21/2.8 - $3495.

>Are these cameras the same price?  Ditto the lens prices (new, 
>street prices).  Apples = Apples?

Leicas are a lot more.  Canon 5D - $2799.95    Leica M8 - 
$4795   Leica lenses are also about twice as much as Canons.


>BTW, the Canon 24 is a full 2 stops faster.....So at the same 
>shutter speed ( or hand holding speed), the Canon can work at 1/4 the
>light..... still favors the Canon.

They were all made at f/5.6 except the Canon 3600 which was at 2.0 - 
just experimenting with depth of field there.  I'm going to try some 
more experiments later.

Tina

Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA
http://www.tinamanley.com 


In reply to: Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)