Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: High ISOs Comparison
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Wed Dec 6 13:46:37 2006
References: <4cfa589b0612060937n10144186jd0dc9d7663f8ef08@mail.gmail.com> <005b01c71971$1798fed0$6401a8c0@FrankDell2> <7.0.1.0.2.20061206151205.0275b168@infoave.net>

A nice library you have there.
Esp. the math power series ;-)

Philippe



Op 6-dec-06, om 21:14 heeft Tina Manley het volgende geschreven:

> At 02:59 PM 12/6/2006, you wrote:
>> Of course, that is the purpose of the Noctilux, the other  
>> 0.00000001% of the time..... .... I think the football analogy is  
>> a Hail
>> Mary......
>>
>> Frank Filippone
>
> O.K.  I tried the Noctilux and I also tried Doug's suggestion of  
> underexposing at a lower ISO.  That shows real promise.  Here are  
> the Noctilux results:
>
> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/comparison  Go to Page 2.
>
> Tina
>
> Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA
> http://www.tinamanley.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re: High ISOs Comparison)
In reply to: Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Re: High ISOs Comparison)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Re: High ISOs Comparison)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re: High ISOs Comparison)