Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]And long live George and Alastair! :-) Thanks for putting things into perspective. Sometimes we can't see the forest because we're too busy criticizing the saplings. --Peter On Dec 8, 2006, at 5:36 PM, Alastair Firkin wrote: > This is my point. I still believe we are lucky to have this choice. At 04:00 PM 12/8/2006 -0800, George Lottermoser wrote: >And I give a hearty second to this belief. > >And if we continue to support their serious efforts I have to believe >that that they will continue to play and bring us more and better >mechano/optical/electronic instruments. > >Further, if another company sees a demand for precision rangefinder >digital cameras the competition may even drive the bus to greater >heights. > >This list was birthed for love of the finest rangefinder cameras ever >made. Nikon had fine ones and dropped the ball. Canon had fine ones >and dropped the ball. Leica kept building them. We all (most of us) >know the very real difference between RF and SLR. We know when to >pick up which and why. We also know the difference between film >digital and when to pickup which and why. > >The days when pj's carried Ms for wide and SLRs for long may very >well return due to the M8. > >Long live digital capture competing with film for speed and resolution. >Long live Kodachrome. >Long live Leica optics. >Long live M's and including M8s. >Long live Alpa, Polaroid, Blad, Rollei Zeiss, and all the wonderful >choices our world of photography has presented us with. > >Regards, >George >george@imagist.com