Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 50: light and shadow
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Wed Dec 20 10:22:19 2006
References: <45884F11.2060408@nathanfoto.com> <70421dc84ed787e7cd4ceaaabe0b9116@comcast.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20061219161722.02469488@infoave.net> <D68A61EE-1A2C-4FAB-B115-4252512C292E@pandora.be> <922aff9f00824a5f1f79cdc69604d603@comcast.net>

Hi Bob,
Maybe I was overreacting. But let's face it: the exlusively Leica  
material postings are long gone since the arrival of digital.
We all stay afficionados though.
Philippe



Op 20-dec-06, om 03:37 heeft Bob Shaw het volgende geschreven:

> Phillipe:
>
> Point taken.
>
> But then, when I was shopping for a new system, I went to Leica- 
> named sites to learn about Leica, Nikon sites for Nikon and Canon  
> for Canon information.
>
> Further, as the daily total of messages on this forum has passed  
> 100 (on more than one recent occasion), one could make the case for  
> a bit of fine tuning with respect to equipment and lenses used for  
> IMG posts.
>
> I don't see that as a stretch, nor as fundamentalism.  I can assure  
> you I still don't go to Canon or Nikon sites in the hope there will  
> be photos taken with a Leica lens.
>
> Whatever your position may be about this topic, I'll continue to  
> subscribe and look forward to IMG posts using Leica bodies and/or  
> lenses.  Maybe I can, with discipline and hard work, develop some  
> sort of clairvoyant ability to judge subject titles before opening  
> or deleting the post.
>
> As I stated before, I aver to the LUG majority on this subject and  
> continue to appreciate the useful information offered daily on this  
> forum to users of Leica photographic equipment.
>
> With Respect,
>
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 19, 2006, at 13:29, Philippe Orlent wrote:
>
> And we do not applaud fundamentalism either, do we?
> Philippe
>
>
> Op 19-dec-06, om 22:19 heeft Tina Manley het volgende geschreven:
>
>> At 03:56 PM 12/19/2006, you wrote:
>>> Nathan:
>>>
>>> Nice work.
>>>
>>> Pardon me for asking, but shouldn't these be posted on the Canon  
>>> site? ( I looked for a Leica lens on Canon body and saw none).
>>>
>>> Bob in Seattle
>>
>> The LUG doesn't restrict photos to just those made with Leicas.   
>> We may be Leica users but most of us are interested in photography  
>> and we'll talk about photos made with any equipment, thank goodness.
>>
>> Tina
>>
>> Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA
>> http://www.tinamanley.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 50: light and shadow)
Message from rsphotoimages at comcast.net (Bob Shaw) ([Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 50: light and shadow)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 50: light and shadow)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 50: light and shadow)
Message from rsphotoimages at comcast.net (Bob Shaw) ([Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 50: light and shadow)