Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Could read as: I took a DMR from my uncle whot thinks it is stolen, and now I am trying to sell this because I know it's worth a lot of money. Now what would be an acceptable explanation to make people believe that I am a legitimate seller? Or it's just another snob idiot that had to have the latest of the latest only to discover as with all the other have-tos he bought before that he actually didn't used it. Hence selling it, to fund the next unnecessary gimmick. In the latter case, I'd say, if you need it, try to get it. Deliver him of his whim at the lowest posiible price. But in the first case I would only hope that the dude can't get it sold and finally gives it back at his uncle. So it's tricky. I would not bid. Philippe Op 11-jan-07, om 20:53 heeft mehrdad het volgende geschreven: > this is an ebay auction with the following description > > > > THE DIGITAL BACK WAS PURCHASED IN MAY OF 2006 AND HAS BEEN USED VERY > LITTLE AS I DID NOT WANT TO TAKE SUCH AN EXPENSIVE PIECE OF EQUIPEMENT > OUTSIDE. I AM SELLING THIS ITEM TO ENABLE ME TO BUY OTHER LENS FOR MY > OTHER CAMERAS. The digital back is in excellent condition. The > firmware is version 1.2. I used the DMR with my R8 (which I will sell > separately if you are interested) with excellent results > > why did this guy buy this and not use it? some of these are reall > funny > > http://cgi.ebay.com/Leica- > DMR_W0QQitemZ200064815923QQihZ010QQcategoryZ73445QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem > > > ------------------------------------- > regards, mehrdad > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >