Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: HoPpY Macro
From: montoid at earthlink.net (Montie)
Date: Tue Jan 23 05:25:53 2007
References: <200701230251.l0N2nFXB035293@server1.waverley.reid.org>

HoPpY...if you just want to dabble, and you're already loaded
with nikkor glass, look for a Nikon "K" ring set on gleeBay. 
Cheap Cheap...work great!  compliments the tubes.

Montie


>Hoppy,
I have been doing macro for a very long time so I have many, many options.
If you want to use your M then a Viso II or III with a LTM to Viso adapter
will let you use extension tubes and enlarging lenses very cheaply.  Or,
stock up on an R4(dirt cheap) a couple of R extension tubes and a 180
preferably one of the APO's.  R bellows are also pretty cheap as well.  Or,
you can use a short tele like a 90 Summicron and the inappropriate Elpro.
All of these options will cost about $500 US if you are starting from
scratch.

Possibly a better option would be to acquire a 180 ED Nikkor and a 6T with
possibly an extension tube.  The old tubes for an F are amazingly cheap but
will force you to shoot pretty close to wide open as you are at working
aperture.  Alternatively, get a male to male 62-52 adapter and use a
50 F1.8reversed in front of that 180 and you will be amazed at what
you will see.

Really, macro can be very cheap to get into if you start with a pretty good
lens.

Nikon is still pretty expensive, for example, I picked up a Canon F1n for
$100 and spent another $100 for a CLA.  I did this as I had found a 200
macro FD for $250 so this lens pretty much stays glued to the F1.  End
result is a very capable system for $450; considering that the new 180 is
over a grand and the new Nikon 100 is over $700 and I am a pretty happy
camper.

Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Re: HoPpY Macro)