Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Luis, As I recall, I swapped a very worn Summarit for the Summitar many years ago. A couple of years ago, I sent it in for a CLA because the aperture ring was getting very stiff. I think that cost me around 70USD. I think they are currently going for 150-200USD. If you have a good one, enjoy it. I think I have one image in my gallery using the IIIf and Summitar. I will link it below. http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Motor_Glider_01.jpg.html Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Luis Ripoll" <luisripoll@telefonica.net> To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 3:40 PM Subject: RE: [Leica] IMG: PAW 4 dlridings-specially to Jim > Jim, > > I absolutely agree with the " ....Summitar _is_ a very underestimated > lens. > I liked it like that (before) because it allowed me to pick one up at a > decent price...." > > For curiosity....what do you mind for a decent price?, I've paid for mine > about 200$, and I'm fully satisfied with it, please look at these > examples: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5210114 > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5210116 > > I think you and me ... And many other Luggers we have a lot of things in > common, ahhhh! The romantic old stuff! Is like a old whisky more than 18 > years old!, that I like very much too! > > Saludos cordiales > Luis > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre > de > Daniel Ridings > Enviado el: domingo, 28 de enero de 2007 21:44 > Para: Leica Users Group > Asunto: Re: [Leica] IMG: PAW 4 dlridings > > Thanks Don, Jim and Luis, > > Don ... I'm glad you suggested that. I guess you could tell I was a little > unsure about these. There was something in them that I liked, but I hadn't > succeeded in pulling it out. It was something abstract that I felt was > there. I felt that when I saw them, before I took them, I just couldn't > put > my finger on it. > > Jim, the Summitar _is_ a very underestimated lens. I liked it like that > (before) because it allowed me to pick one up at a decent price. > > The bokeh can get dominating when you shoot it wide-open at close focus, > but > once you get the hang of it, it is a nice lens, no doubt about it. > > Thanks all! > Daniel > > > On 1/28/07, Don Dory <don.dory@gmail.com> wrote: >> Daniel, >> I rather like the bottom image. Take a look at it with the background >> line of trees cropped out; it becomes a more interesting abstract to my > eyes. >> >> Don >> don.dory@gmial.com >> >> On 1/28/07, Daniel Ridings <dlridings@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > It's been a cold, damp week: >> > >> > http://www.dlridings.com/paw2007/4.html >> > >> > Daniel >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Leica Users Group. >> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >