Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm sorry Ric, but I can't understand what you mind, my English comprension is limited to a ...very easy grammatical sense... Saludos cordiales...., but enjoy your Summitar! Luis -----Mensaje original----- De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre de Ric Carter Enviado el: domingo, 28 de enero de 2007 22:51 Para: Leica Users Group Asunto: Re: [Leica] IMG: PAW 4 dlridings Now Summitar Do you guys find that it needs a good shade, or does it even make a difference? I've got one I haven't used a lot. The shade kinda defeats the compactness of the collapsible. Ric On Jan 28, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Luis Ripoll wrote: > Jim, > > I absolutely agree with the " ....Summitar _is_ a very underestimated > lens. > I liked it like that (before) because it allowed me to pick one up at > a decent price...." > > For curiosity....what do you mind for a decent price?, I've paid for > mine about 200$, and I'm fully satisfied with it, please look at these > examples: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5210114 > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5210116 > > I think you and me ... And many other Luggers we have a lot of things > in common, ahhhh! The romantic old stuff! Is like a old whisky more > than 18 years old!, that I like very much too! > > Saludos cordiales > Luis > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En > nombre de Daniel Ridings Enviado el: domingo, 28 de enero de 2007 > 21:44 > Para: Leica Users Group > Asunto: Re: [Leica] IMG: PAW 4 dlridings > > Thanks Don, Jim and Luis, > > Don ... I'm glad you suggested that. I guess you could tell I was a > little unsure about these. There was something in them that I liked, > but I hadn't succeeded in pulling it out. It was something abstract > that I felt was there. I felt that when I saw them, before I took > them, I just couldn't put my finger on it. > > Jim, the Summitar _is_ a very underestimated lens. I liked it like > that > (before) because it allowed me to pick one up at a decent price. > > The bokeh can get dominating when you shoot it wide-open at close > focus, but once you get the hang of it, it is a nice lens, no doubt > about it. > > Thanks all! > Daniel > > > On 1/28/07, Don Dory <don.dory@gmail.com> wrote: >> Daniel, >> I rather like the bottom image. Take a look at it with the >> background line of trees cropped out; it becomes a more interesting >> abstract to my > eyes. >> >> Don >> don.dory@gmial.com >> >> On 1/28/07, Daniel Ridings <dlridings@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> It's been a cold, damp week: >>> >>> http://www.dlridings.com/paw2007/4.html >>> >>> Daniel >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information