Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Adobe Lightroom Vs. Apple Aperture
From: lists at gilplant.com (J. Gilbert Plantinga)
Date: Mon Jan 29 16:55:48 2007
References: <C1E3F188.436AD%mark@rabinergroup.com>

For me it's a no-brainer until Apple adds support for the RAW .dng  
files from my DMR, and I suppose that would go for M8 users too. I've  
just started playing with the Lightroom beta, and thus far it rocks  
on both my MacPro and MacBook Pro.

Gilbert

On Jan 29, 2007, at 6:46 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> Sounds like a great thing but the obvious comparison question is  
> how does it
> stack up to APPLE APERTURE? I'm sure that could be found all over  
> but I know
> the people here. And I know some have used both. And both seem to  
> be for the
> same things. No ones chiming in WHAT!?!!?! get Aperture instead so  
> I assume
> its not a big deal. And I'm working off laptops not mainframes.  
> That would
> be an APPLE drawback as I understand it. They build software to try  
> to make
> you get a bigger newer computer. Gates thinks you can use an old  
> Laptop as
> far as he cares. Didn't use to be like that.
> When Word 4 came out you needed a new computer to run it.
> Something like that.


Replies: Reply from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Adobe Lightroom Vs. Apple Aperture)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Adobe Lightroom Vs. Apple Aperture)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Adobe Lightroom Vs. Apple Aperture)