Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Ansel Adam's camera
From: leica at rcmckee.com (R. Clayton McKee)
Date: Thu Mar 8 08:45:22 2007
References: <200703081523.l28FMm8n066375@server1.waverley.reid.org>, <DFE5093F-240C-48E3-A30A-F5AF40C14C2B@optonline.net>

Quoth the Lawrence Zeitlin :

> prints. Neglected were such trivia as grain size, dust spotting, and 
> the inevitable loss of image quality in enlargement.


The Best Camera in the world is the one you'll be looking through 
when the best picture in the world jumps out in front of you and 
waves.

The Worst Camera in the world is any of the others that you're NOT..

Unless you're a collector, in which case the best camera is the one 
which everyone in the world wants and only you have.

Let's not confuse tools with job.

--


R. Clayton McKee                           http://www.rcmckee.com
Photojournalist                               rcmckee@rcmckee.com
P O Box 571900                           voice/fax   713/783-3502
Houston, TX 77257-1900                   cell phone #  on request


Replies: Reply from phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] Re: Ansel Adam's camera)
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: Ansel Adam's camera)