Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 6 bit coding for m8 lenses
From: len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier)
Date: Tue Mar 13 04:57:30 2007
References: <847199.19041.qm@web25502.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <78B401B2-ADAB-487F-9CA3-381B57C90F1E@earthlink.net> <C0C01B72-D617-4425-8940-23304E765202@mchsi.com> <20070313121233.M75092@gruberphotographers.com>
 
Terry,

I'm only coding my wide angles. Except for seeing which lens was used  
in the EXIF data, I see no reason to code above 35mm. I have filters  
on all my lenses except those which take 60mm filters and see nothing  
wrong with 50mm and above. I can't speak for the Noctilux but I don't  
see vignetting and coding won't make it focus better.

Regards,
Len


On Mar 13, 2007, at 8:18 AM, terry wrote:

> I am wondering what the LUG sees as the big advantage to having all  
> your Leica lenses coded?
> 28, 35, 50 1.4, 50 1.0, 75, 90
>
> Given the turn around time I received on one lens (28) I am  
> wondering how I would ever schedule the
> rest imbetween jobs and use.
>
> Terry
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from nickbroberts at yahoo.co.uk (Nick Roberts) ([Leica] Re: Leica CL and Rollei 35SE batteries)
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Re: Leica CL and Rollei 35SE batteries)
Message from pjleeson at mchsi.com (Philip Leeson) ([Leica] Re: Leica CL and Rollei 35SE batteries)
Message from terry at gruberphotographers.com (terry) ([Leica] 6 bit coding for m8 lenses)