Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Smiles
From: jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman)
Date: Sun Mar 25 08:18:56 2007
References: <241113.69327.qm@web35610.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Remembered a thread a few days back about pictures with smiles, or ones that
cause them.  (I really loved the Hell station, especially after filling up
the '57 Dodge the other day with premium!_

On Friday visited a friend in the area, who just gave birth to a baby boy in
January.  Xander is her joy and a triumph--the first successful birth after
a decade of fertility treatments.  He's out of his "strangers virus"
quarantine period, so we were vetted for a visit.

http://tinyurl.com/2g9gur

They told me no flash; I told them no problem.  Used my digital M3, with old
Summilux 50 and Ilford XP2 digital film.  When they asked me how I could
take pictures in such low light without an in-camera flash, I began talking
about 1956 technology.

Best,
Jim Shulman
Bryn Mawr, PA  Who's off to pick up the prints.


Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Smiles)
Reply from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] Smiles)
Reply from jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Smiles)
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Smiles)
Reply from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] Smiles)
Reply from phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] Smiles)
Reply from rclark01 at comcast.net (Robert Clark) ([Leica] Smiles)
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Smiles)
In reply to: Message from bill_clough at yahoo.com (Bill Clough) ([Leica] Panhandle: Clarendon sandstorm)