Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Phillipe, Like many others, I have found the 24-70L 2.8 to be a good lens. It is a bit heavy, but I use an Upstrap on the camera body and its stays secure on the shoulder. Another Canon lens I really like is the 10-22, but it only works on the 20D and 30D. When I get time, I'll probably get a 5D (or whatever its replacement is), and then I'll be stuck with buying the 16-35 2.8 also. Thanks for looking. Ken > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug- > bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Philippe Orlent > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 1:52 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] more flowers > > That 24-70 looks like a real asset. I mostly only read good things > about is, and this one is yet another proof of its excellence. > Anybody with a 17-55/2.8 out there? I'm looking for first hand > feedback. And for those that can compare: how does it do against its > Nikon counterpart? > > Thanks for showing, > Philippe > > Op 26-mrt-07, om 01:48 heeft Ken Carney het volgende geschreven: > > > Here are some from our backyard today. I don't know how I got into > > the > > flower thing, but it's sort of addictive. These were all with the > > Canon > > 24-70 2.8. I'll be headed back to New Mexico before long, though > > it will be > > digital now. I'm amazed at how quickly this all developed, so to > > speak. > > > > Ken > > www.kencarney.com > > > > > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/kcarney/_MG_5053_052507.jpg.html > > > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/kcarney/_MG_5060_032507.jpg.html > > > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/kcarney/_MG_5072_052507.jpg.html