Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: We Got Daffs, too!
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Mon Apr 2 13:04:59 2007
References: <89B656A9-6A4F-4106-A2C6-5E95E1077F38@mac.com>

Daff_3 works best for me due to the fact that I seem to have a  
negative reaction to photographs of flowers where the flower is  
simply photographed in the more or less center of the frame. Daff_2  
certainly is a beautiful specimen - but that's the problem I have it  
looks like a scientific kind of record of a beautiful thing. Whereas  
Daff_3 reaches for photographic composition.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com



On Mar 27, 2007, at 8:32 PM, Bernard Quinn wrote:

>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Barney/Daff_1.jpg.html
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Barney/Daff_2.jpg.html
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Barney/Daff_3.jpg.html


Replies: Reply from bjq1 at mac.com (Bernard Quinn) ([Leica] IMG: We Got Daffs, too!)
In reply to: Message from bjq1 at mac.com (Bernard Quinn) ([Leica] IMG: We Got Daffs, too!)