Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: We Got Daffs, too!
From: bjq1 at mac.com (Bernard Quinn)
Date: Mon Apr 2 18:33:47 2007
References: <89B656A9-6A4F-4106-A2C6-5E95E1077F38@mac.com> <363C3BFF-798E-4F26-BE52-B7FB9D1F4AE8@mac.com>

George,

Thanks for looking and commenting. I think that you make a good  
point. It is very tempting when you are photographing a single  
blossom to approach it as if it were a formal portrait. I certainly  
tend to do this.

Barney

On Apr 2, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Lottermoser George wrote:

> Daff_3 works best for me due to the fact that I seem to have a  
> negative reaction to photographs of flowers where the flower is  
> simply photographed in the more or less center of the frame. Daff_2  
> certainly is a beautiful specimen - but that's the problem I have  
> it looks like a scientific kind of record of a beautiful thing.  
> Whereas Daff_3 reaches for photographic composition.
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george@imagist.com
>
>
>
> On Mar 27, 2007, at 8:32 PM, Bernard Quinn wrote:
>
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Barney/Daff_1.jpg.html
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Barney/Daff_2.jpg.html
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Barney/Daff_3.jpg.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from bjq1 at mac.com (Bernard Quinn) ([Leica] IMG: We Got Daffs, too!)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] IMG: We Got Daffs, too!)