Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica USA incompetence again
From: ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Fri Apr 20 04:44:41 2007
References: <FA64FC1A5B56F4A3FEFB8D2F@hindolveston.reid.org> <ced6f0541ff77.4627e3c4@shaw.ca> <28895A820C8689B42786F5B0@rutabook.reid.org>

Brian, you are clearly "snake-bit."

You don't deserve it, and have our sympathy.

Ric


On Apr 20, 2007, at 12:49 AM, Brian Reid wrote:

> The lens that was in the box along with the misaddressed card was 6- 
> bit coded. That means that it was put there more recently than six  
> months ago. But anybody who prints warranty cards that are  
> addressed to a non-permanent address is an idiot. This is one of  
> the reasons why God invented Post Office boxes and mail forwarding  
> services.
>
>
>> The address on the registration card is their old address. If it  
>> has been more than 6 months since they moved the Post Office may  
>> no longer forward on to them their mail.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Leica USA incompetence again)
Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) ([Leica] Leica USA incompetence again)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Leica USA incompetence again)