Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Eric, I'm confused there. With your monitor calibrated you have its own profile installed. That might well fit into the sRGB but not necessarily show all of it. However I suspect that the weak link may be using a web browser to display the images. I don't know if that will match what is happening in a colour management compliant prog. I may well be wrong there, I'm not expert on what the web browser does. I bet they don't look the same as in photoshop. Are you previewing in the same browser on your machine? Of course you have no control at all in what your client's computers (monitors) do to your images. Most would very likely not be colour managed. I just recently looked at the LUG contest gallery on two different laptops. The pictures looked horrible vs on a calibrated setup. Cheers Hoppy -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Eric Korenman Sent: Friday, 27 April 2007 20:38 To: LUG Subject: [Leica] Re: JPEG look on LR vs the web My system is calibrated by Spyder 2 and the deafult window color space is sRGB IEC61966-2.1 Eric On 4/27/07, Eric Korenman <faneuil@gmail.com> wrote: > > I know this may be more of an adobe forum question. but: > > My monitors are calibrated. Everything looks super in LR, PS and ACDSee. > Skin tones are warm and lovely. > > Exported Jpeg images also look great in any of these three programs. > However, the images look quite ruddy when opened in Internet explorer or > any or other lesser image viewer. > I am concerned that clients are seeing very color shifted ruddy skin tones > when I email them or post proofs. > I am sending them sRGB Jpegs. > > Where is the problem? > > Eric > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information