Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Vanishing darkroom supplies
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Thu May 3 06:46:21 2007
References: <200705030213.l432CVaA018951@server1.waverley.reid.org> <FC2FF393-4371-4F7E-BED6-6155CBCE2A46@optonline.net> <7AA01492-6358-4378-8338-32796443BD8D@mac.com> <a3f189160705030640m11639ebcrc15827bb81234fff@mail.gmail.com>

Maybe they were all done with M8s. That would be an easy call.

Sonny Carter wrote:
> On 5/3/07, Kenneth Frazier <kennybod@mac.com> wrote:
>
> ALL of the digital submissions were rejected.  Not one got in the show.
>
> ----------------------------
>
> How could they tell?  Did you have to give  Camera specs?
>
> This reminds me of a publisher I have to deal with, who requires all
> submissions to be tifs at 300 dpi and eight inches on the top, whether 
> the
> shot is landscape or portrait.  Then the thing is published and the 
> shot is
> two inches tall in the book.
>
> I worked one book project that in six months had three "submissions 
> editors"
> all of  which I suspect to be interns, because they could not answer 
> any of
> my questions on the first phone call, they all had to "get back to me on
> that."
>
> SonC
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: Vanishing darkroom supplies)
Message from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] Re: Vanishing darkroom supplies)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Re: Vanishing darkroom supplies)