Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/06/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: $99 Samsung
From: drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers)
Date: Fri Jun 8 06:40:58 2007

Phil,

Very nice images...and quite varied. 

The sandwich photo made me hungry! :-)

DaveR

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Swango [mailto:pswango@att.net] 
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 8:41 PM
To: LUG
Subject: [Leica] Re: $99 Samsung

Ric Carter wrote:
Phil Swango wrote a few weeks ago about a $99 Samsung 6 megapixel
camera he picked up.

What was the model, Phil?
==========================

Same one, Ric.  S630.  But I have a couple of comments.  First, the
Samsung
has a menu setting for type of battery.  The default setting is NIMH.
When
I first got mine the switch was set to AA and my first NIMHs didn't last
very long either.  Then I changed the switch back to NIMH, recharged the
2300 mah batteries and have had no further problems.  I use the camera
every
day and only recharge every few days.  I've never kept track of the
actual
number of shots but I haven't had a (NIMH) battery run down since that
first
incident.  Considering it's a 2-AA system I'd say battery life is about
average.  Maybe not as robust as my Canon, with 4 AAs.  I also keep an
extra
set of charged batteries in my bag.

I'm quite happy with the Samsung but there are so many variables in
picking
a digital camera that it's hard to advise someone else.  I also have a
Canon
A610, which is a "better" camera, but I prefer using the Samsung.  For
one
thing it's a lot lighter.  I really like having a cheap, worry-free
camera
in my bag at all times and if I lost it I'd buy another.

I posted some Samsung shots a while back.  If anyone's interested,
here's
the link again:

http://picasaweb.google.com/paswango/Samsung





-- 
Phil Swango
307 Aliso Dr SE
Albuquerque, NM 87108
505-262-4085




In reply to: Message from pswango at att.net (Phil Swango) ([Leica] Re: $99 Samsung)