Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/07/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: do i need a hasselblad?
From: shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka)
Date: Tue Jul 3 15:59:06 2007
References: <70d5554f0707030606m107c87b7hf1b1067fadbfcb49@mail.gmail.com> <F4E3550C-87FA-42F2-80C9-FE322DE49186@mac.com> <82c9dd70707030832r40fbb4d6q4362889e5b85d460@mail.gmail.com>
 
BASIC?

-rei

On Jul03 11:32, Eric Korenman wrote:
> OY - such a tiring an argument I haven't seen (sorry.. channelling my
> Brooklyn ancestors)
> 
> Here is yoru answer:
> 
> 10 BUY X
> 20 TAKE (PICTURES)
> 30 PRINT (PICTURES)
> 40 If (PICTURES <= GREAT) and (time elapsed > 12 months) then SELL X  ELSE
> GOTO 20
> 40 GOTO 10
> 
> 3 years later ..I still have my Hasselblad
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

-- 
Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
Ridgewood, New Jersey
Replies: Reply from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] Re: do i need a hasselblad?)
 In reply to: Message from benmarks2005 at gmail.com (Benjamin Marks) ([Leica] Re: do i need a hasselblad?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Re: do i need a hasselblad?)
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] Re: do i need a hasselblad?)