Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/07/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: LUG Olympus vs. Leica
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Wed Jul 18 23:20:24 2007
References: <A38142A2-B74D-4B51-A5A0-3DF921113BF2@btinternet.com> <C2C478D7.60555%mark@rabinergroup.com>

That was true until the E-400/E-410 came out. They are smaller than 
the K100D, D40X, Rebel XTi... etc. They are now the smallest DSLRs.

At 11:11 PM 7/18/2007, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>...So far all the 4/3's camera have been bigger than the smallest APS-C 
>format
>cameras. They are giving the specs in millimeters on the Olympus so you
>can't do a direct comparison against the inches Nikon and Canon gives.

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, 
please use richard at imagecraft.com) 


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: LUG Olympus vs. Leica)
In reply to: Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Re: LUG Olympus vs. Leica)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: LUG Olympus vs. Leica)