Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Armed vs. Unarmed and murder rates
From: kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney)
Date: Sat Aug 11 16:40:14 2007
 
Well, I think these guys definitely went to college or something.  They seem
to be saying that violent crime is a human action, not that of the
instrument.  More interesting than that is that the paper seems to have some
connection with Berkeley (Beserkeley).  The sad results of the UK ban
experiment are pretty well set out.  "An armed society is a polite society"
(Robert A. Heinlein).

Back to photography.  I'm having a blast (sorry) playing with the 32-bit HDR
stuff and raw files.  Is anyone else?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-
> bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of J. Braun
> Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 2:20 PM
> To: lug@leica-users.org
> Subject: [Leica] Armed vs. Unarmed and murder rates
> 
> 
> To add to this interesting discussion, consider this research paper:
> 
> http://law.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7212&context=expresso
> 
> JB
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] HDR----was that other thread)
Reply from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] Armed vs. Unarmed and murder rates)
 In reply to: Message from jbraun at msn.com (J. Braun) ([Leica] Armed vs. Unarmed and murder rates)