Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Unsworth w33/now expos comp M8
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Tue Sep 11 19:50:56 2007
References: <C30A2BE8.F9FB%lug@steveunsworth.co.uk> <07E896C2-1F84-41D3-833D-7C123FC25190@cox.net> <9b678e0709111607i48508614se6f0551bb6d41994@mail.gmail.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20070911204520.02625698@comporium.net>

Tina,
Actually, yes I have gone the other way.  I was using the 21 SA and didn't
keep track of changing light.  Blown highlights stay blown even with the max
adjustment in LR.  So, I would much rather go a little under rather than go
over too much.  Going right on the histogram will work but you have to check
that the over doesn't reach the top which for me would be studio work where
I would not be using an M.  YMMV.

On 9/11/07, Tina Manley <images@comporium.net> wrote:
>
> At 07:07 PM 9/11/2007, you wrote:
> >So, when shooting the M8, err on the side of underexposure; if
> >the historgram starts at 125 and goes to the left you still can have an
> >outstanding image.
>
> But have you tried it the other way?  Supposedly the shadows will
> have much less noise and the highlights that look blown are not
> really if you expose so the histogram goes to the right.  I haven't
> experimented enough to know yet, but I will.
>
> Tina
>
> Tina Manley
> ASMP, NPPA, EP, PI
> http://www.tinamanley.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Don
don.dory@gmail.com

In reply to: Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] Steve Unsworth PAW - week 33)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Unsworth w33/now expos comp M8)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Unsworth w33/now expos comp M8)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Unsworth w33/now expos comp M8)