Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] R lens comparison
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson)
Date: Wed Sep 26 02:01:00 2007
References: <93E9EFE9-E2EC-4968-8C2E-EFBCB660FA2B@btinternet.com> <C31F95FF.6C815%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Mark lets hope the floating elements are not made of metal. Terrible light 
transmission properties ;-)
Definitely all glass and no plastic will be fine. Now for the mounts we'll 
be happy with meticulously machined metal.
Cheers
Hoppy

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org 
[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Mark Rabiner
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2007 18:52
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] R lens comparison



absolutely Frank. tolerances have got to be a good part of it.
The price of the glass itself they are willing to use a nice chunk as I was
saying.
And as you're saying I think; quality manufacturing workmanship being the
main thing.
__

I hear of these floating elements in zooms made of plastic.
I'd think in the high priced Leica spread they'd be for sure metal.
And real nice metal at at that!

So one bump and you don't then have a real soft lens.

Mark William Rabiner
rabinergroup.com



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] R lens comparison)
In reply to: Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] R lens comparison)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] R lens comparison)