Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/10/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work)
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Mon Oct 1 09:37:19 2007
References: <4268A9826B9DBE4D938B902A6BC803083944EF@exchange8.asc.local> <46FF6D91.1040007@hemenway.com> <000601c80351$4be56be0$6401a8c0@asus930> <471B7676-3F5A-4F05-914F-C9C6A3A88E70@cox.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20070930132131.0249d030@comporium.net> <D04F9AF2-C40C-46E9-8038-F2F75E62EABE@cox.net> <C193A720-D8A8-44E6-A43F-7073F249E961@mac.com>

I'm still trying to discover what real is. Have more than a passing 
acquaintance with fake, but not real. Hell, everything could be fake. 
What if there isn't really any real?

Walt


Lottermoser George wrote:
> My immediate reaction to seeing the photo: "No relationship to reality 
> (as I experience it)."
> Then: "illustrative. Of what? What does this intend to illustrate? I 
> don't understand its message."
>
> The lighting (the reason Kyle pointed us to it) does have some appeal.
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george@imagist.com
>
>
>
> On Sep 30, 2007, at 12:55 PM, Steve Barbour wrote:
>
>>> But not to me ;-)  It made me gag to look at it.  The skirt is too 
>>> far in her mouth to be sexy - more like a gag.  That's just a 
>>> female's perspective, though.
>>
>>
>>
>> well it made me gag too..
>>
>> and a little sad too...
>>
>> (because of the very young girl, who looks even younger)
>>
>> maybe because of the proximity of the image to soft porn, the age of 
>> the girl, mixed with the obvious manipulation and opportunism...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Reply from phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
In reply to: Message from kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu (Kyle Cassidy) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))