Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/10/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work)
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Mon Oct 1 10:41:31 2007
References: <4268A9826B9DBE4D938B902A6BC803083944EF@exchange8.asc.local> <46FF6D91.1040007@hemenway.com> <000601c80351$4be56be0$6401a8c0@asus930> <471B7676-3F5A-4F05-914F-C9C6A3A88E70@cox.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20070930132131.0249d030@comporium.net> <D04F9AF2-C40C-46E9-8038-F2F75E62EABE@cox.net> <C193A720-D8A8-44E6-A43F-7073F249E961@mac.com> <4701223B.8000505@waltjohnson.com> <47013092.5030000@numericable.fr>
On Oct 1, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Philippe Amard wrote:
> Then the faking would be real ...
when did this thread turn to politics?
Steve
Replies:
Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
In reply to:
Message from kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu (Kyle Cassidy) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))
Message from phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] portrait of elizabeth (mostly safe for work))