Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/12/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Fwd: Re: [Leica] another opinion on the state of the art
From: chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich)
Date: Thu Dec 13 10:37:47 2007

>To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>From: Chris Saganich <chs2018@med.cornell.edu>
>Subject: Re: [Leica] another opinion on the state of the art
>
>Well I'm not sure photography has any special link with reality.  Any such 
>link is purely the property of the viewers mind.  It is what makes still 
>images unique all minds are different.  As far as digital revolution goes 
>the ontology of equipment hasn't been transformed nor has the substantive 
>output for the majority of photographers.  There has been change but I'm 
>not sure if it is important.  For example the equipment of a photographer 
>has several properties:
>
>It is being used and not collecting dust on a shelf.  (ready to hand)
>It is being used towards some purpose.  (towards which)
>The purpose has a final goal.  (final towards which)
>The goal relates the photographer to him or herself.  Defining themselves 
>or taking a stand about themselves. (for the sake of which)
>
>These are near universal properties of equipment (except perhaps in 
>primitive societies) digital or film cameras, a rake or hammer, an 
>airplane.  Any serious photographer either is working this out or has 
>worked it out.  It isn't the equipment that id's us it is the practice so 
>we are not just using equipment towards making an object.  The question is 
>do pixles change how we identify ourselves as photographers?
>
> From Descartes to Heidegger.  Who are we???
>
>
>At 05:24 PM 12/12/2007, you wrote:
>>What I find interesting here is the reference to the lack of
>>"structure" of the material - very true - yet, are photographers still to 
>>be considered as frustrated painters? or have they at long last acquired 
>>a "right" to express themselves using another medium?.
>>phx
>>
>>Lottermoser George wrote:
>>
>>><http://www.imaginginfo.com/online/article.jsp? 
>>>siteSection=3&id=3323&pageNum=3#>
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>George Lottermoser
>>>george@imagist.com
>>>http://www.imagist.com
>>>http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>>Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>Chris Saganich, Sr. Physicist
>Weill Medical College of Cornell University
>New York Presbyterian Hospital
>chs2018@med.cornell.edu
>http://intranet.med.cornell.edu/research/health_phys/
>Ph. 212.746.6964
>Fax. 212.746.4800
>Office A-0049

Chris Saganich, Sr. Physicist
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
New York Presbyterian Hospital
chs2018@med.cornell.edu
http://intranet.med.cornell.edu/research/health_phys/
Ph. 212.746.6964
Fax. 212.746.4800
Office A-0049