Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/12/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] That Harvey 777 (vs. Xtol 1:3)
From: jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Sat Dec 15 07:03:00 2007
References: <200712151022.lBFAMvai033230@dragonsgate2.imagecraft.com>

This is about the only stuff I ever found on it.
http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Harvey/harvey.html




On Dec 15, 2007 4:08 AM, Richard <richard-lists@imagecraft.com> wrote:

> Sigh, I was re-scanning some photos to make 10x16 prints. This year I
> haven't done too much B&W until recently, so I mixed up a batch of
> Xtol. The grain is definitely way excellent in their soup, even for
> Neopan 1600. Mark is right, it's almost like Neopan 1600 is ASA400.
> However, I re-scanned the Harvey 777 developed films and oh man, the
> highlight is to die for. It glows and just go on and on. It's really
> dirty though, I mean the soup have stuff floating in it and digital
> scanning only accentuate the problems :-( I think I will mix up
> another batch though and do diligent to shoot more B&W again, and
> take care to filter the solution frequently.
>
> Any recommendation of how to determine the best development time? I
> guess I should borrow a copy of Adam's "Negatives" eh? :-)
>
> // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly,
> please use richard at imagecraft.com)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Jeffery L. Smith
New Orleans, LA

In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] That Harvey 777 (vs. Xtol 1:3))