Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/12/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Speaking of the M9...
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sun Dec 16 12:34:18 2007
References: <121420072142.23407.4762F8C1000B764800005B6F219791332903010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com><4762FC9A.3080508@wanadoo.nl><711913023-1197670316-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-407398031-@bxe137.bisx.prod.on.blackberry><476304B5.1040206@wanadoo.nl> <1000062620-1197672249-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1993900189-@bxe137.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <F5C0126B-E042-4110-BABC-BAAC612FAE15@pandora.be>

On Dec 16, 2007, at 1:16 PM, Philippe Orlent wrote:

> B.D. is back, his respectfull writing matters included...
> Personally, I think that Michiel has a very good point. There's  
> stlll film lovers around.
> I'm just back from 3 days of Paris with only an MP.


I bought an MP recently Philippe, wow !! now I can use the same lenses  
as the M8...

;-)

love it,

Steve



> The P&S en the D200 stayed at home.
> I had been a long time since I had so much shooting fun.
> And for the digital part, there's still better than Leica ATM.
> Its not Olly either.
> Philippe
>
>
>
> Op 14-dec-07, om 23:44 heeft bd@bdcolenphoto.com het volgende  
> geschreven:
>
>> No, I'm not still shooting with my M3, nor am I still shooting with  
>> my M6. I'm shooting digital. But then this is the LUG, where people  
>> often pine for what was and lust for what never will be. ;-)
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michiel Fokkema <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl>
>>
>> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:33:25
>> To:Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Speaking of the M9...
>>
>>
>> Are you still shooting with your M3?
>> Nobody ever needed a meter in a M until the M5 came out. Nobody ever
>> needed AE on a M until the M7 came out. Remember?
>> I shot a few months with a Konica hexar rf. Although it wasn't as  
>> nice
>> as an M7 I really liked the 1/4000th high shutter speed. Shooting  
>> tri-x
>> with wider aperture all through the day. The M7/M6 are great camera's
>> but the slow 1/1000th and slow flash sync are a draw back.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Michiel Fokkema
>>
>> bd@bdcolenphoto.com wrote:
>>> Ohdeargod. The M6/7/MP aren't good enough and expensive enough?
>>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Michiel Fokkema <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl>
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:58:50
>>> To:Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Speaking of the M9...
>>>
>>>
>>> They always say it is not  possible, but in the end it is.
>>> personaly I hope the M9 will be a film camera. With the shutter of  
>>> the
>>> M8/R9. That will be great.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>>
>>> Michiel fokkema
>>>
>>> grduprey@mchsi.com wrote:
>>>> Richard,
>>>>
>>>> I don't think it will be quite that easy, or they would have done  
>>>> it already.  Part of the problem is the shutter opening size  
>>>> needs to be larger than full frame.  This was the reason the DMR  
>>>> was not FF, and the same reason, or one of the issues with the  
>>>> M8.  Also the electronics will have to be updated to handle the  
>>>> larger sensor.  I'm sure there are other issues but these are two  
>>>> biggies.
>>>>
>>>> Gene
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------- Original message from Richard 
>>>> <richard-lists@imagecraft.com 
>>>> >: --------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Did any little birds tell anyone what the rumor time lines are? I
>>>>> understand that R10-D or whatever it is called is the current high
>>>>> priority, but the M9 should just be an "easy" case of slapping  
>>>>> on the
>>>>> new sensor to the M8, add a grip so people would stop complaining
>>>>> about the shutter and they are done, no?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly,
>>>>> please use richard at imagecraft.com)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>>> information
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com) ([Leica] Speaking of the M9...)
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] Speaking of the M9...)
Message from bd at bdcolenphoto.com (bd@bdcolenphoto.com) ([Leica] Speaking of the M9...)
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] Speaking of the M9...)
Message from bd at bdcolenphoto.com (bd@bdcolenphoto.com) ([Leica] Speaking of the M9...)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Speaking of the M9...)