Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Wed Jan 9 15:26:31 2008
References: <6170667.1199556928363.JavaMail.root@elwamui-little.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <p0623090bc3a5e07bd772@[10.1.16.128]> <000301c8523f$6dd85310$4001a8c0@MATTHEW>

Wow!
Being a cityboy: is that water color natural?
Thanks for showing,
Philippe



Op 8-jan-08, om 22:42 heeft Matthew Hunt het volgende geschreven:

> But it caught this salmon for me!
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/mnsh/Scot_0707/fauna/ 
> L1002954.jpg.html
> Matthew
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+matthew=hunt.tc@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+matthew=hunt.tc@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of  
> Henning
> Wulff
> Sent: 06 January 2008 01:38
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens
>
> At 10:15 AM -0800 1/5/08, wildlightphoto@earthlink.net wrote:
>> Raimo K <raimo.m.korhonen@uusikaupunki.fi>
>>
>>> Since when do they use this designation?
>>
>> Since 1984 at least if not earlier.
>>
>> Doug Herr
>> Sacramento
>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: <wildlightphoto@earthlink.net>
>>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>>> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 3:17 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a  
>>> Lens
>>>
>>>
>>>>  Raimo K <raimo.m.korhonen@uusikaupunki.fi> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> APO means apochromatic correction of the lens, there are no  
>>>>> apochromatic
>>>>> elements.
>>>>
>>>>  In Leica's case, APO is the designation they use for the extra-low
>>>>  dispersion glass which their optical designers feel is  
>>>> essential to
>>>>  designing lenses with apochromatic performance.  This is like  
>>>> Nikon's
> use
>>>>  of the ED designation for their extra-low dispersion glass.   
>>>> Raimo is
>>>>  correct that there are no apochromatic elements, but there is  
>>>> APO glass
>>>>  which is used to design apochromatic lenses.
>>>>
>
>
> In Leica's case they also use the term correctly. They use the APO
> designation to indicate apochromatic correction. Yes, in many cases
> special low dispersion glasses can help to achieve this, but low
> dispersion or anomalous dispersion glass is not essential for
> apochromatic correction.
>
> Leica uses low dispersion glasses on various non-apochromatic  
> lenses as
> well.
>
> -- 
>     *            Henning J. Wulff
>    /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
>   /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
>   |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from matthew at hunt.tc (Matthew Hunt) ([Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto@earthlink.net) ([Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens)
Message from matthew at hunt.tc (Matthew Hunt) ([Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens)