Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jan 30, 2008, at 4:52 PM, Lottermoser George wrote: > And further - each can be archived, sensibly or not. > The life expectancy of film, paper, and / or digital information > depends on the intelligence and interest of the archivist; and / or > their heirs; dependent on air quality, light intensity, time and > temperature; they will all affect film, paper, cd's, dvd's, hard > drives, etc. > Ultimately, those handling the material, over time, need to have > real interest in preserving it. > > Do you film folks know what your great grand children will think of > your collection of tri-x? can you imagine, if we were just finding 3 old suitcases full of Capa's CD's... ? what will the future hold? Steve > > > On Jan 30, 2008, at 5:36 PM, wildlightphoto@earthlink.net wrote: > >> Do we need another film-vs.-digital thread? Each has its merits, >> drawbacks, fans and detractors, and either medium is as real as the >> users >> choose to make it. > > Fond regards, > George > george@imagist.com > www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information