Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Reductionism isn't legit OT
From: robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier)
Date: Fri Feb 1 16:24:50 2008
References: <380-2200826201856677@M2W041.mail2web.com>

Doug,

That it CAN be converted physically and made visible makes all the 
difference in the world.

Robert
PS  I have really been enjoying all your images and the text in  Wild Light 
1971 to 2007 very much.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <wildlightphoto@earthlink.net>
To: <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 6:19 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Reductionism isn't legit OT


<Afterswift@aol.com> wrote:

> It may not be wrong consider digital as not the real thing.  Digital is a
> state of electromagnetic charge. Silver is an element. Silver,  even in a
> latent image, is still an element, which is tangible and real.  Digital
> has to be converted to analog and then into elements using some  device.

Unless I'm mistaken, in the latent image the distinction between an exposed
silver halide an an unexposed molecule consists of the energy state of
electrons.  It has to be converted by chemical developers to be visible.
The difference with digital photography is that the photo receptors are
re-usable.

Doug Herr
Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web.com - What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint




_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto@earthlink.net) ([Leica] Reductionism isn't legit OT)