Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/03/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]over all i was happy with Lee, he moved the company forward, the m8 came out (according to leica in the fastest time), new cheap lenses (good ones). he moved a company out of stone ages to sort of present and made money doing so with the "old culture" still in place. my guess on the R line is the old lenses will work. leica is not big enough to roll out a whole new mount with lenses unless Panasonic is making the lenses. the current R mount is big enough to work on canon full frame so it should work on the new leica R. I would be very happy if panasonic can make leice designed lenses at a faster cheaper pace On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Steve Unsworth <lug@steveunsworth.co.uk> wrote: > Doug, given that most people print digitally these days wouldn't it make > more sense if the sensor sides were in the same ratio as A3 etc - 1 for > the > short side, square root of 2 for the long? I.e 36mm x 25.46mm > > Maybe that's what they mean by a larger that full frame sensor? > > Steve > > > On 10/3/08 17:36, "wildlightphoto@earthlink.net" > > <wildlightphoto@earthlink.net> wrote: > > > and (pure speculation) 22MP could mean a 29mm x 36mm sensor if the R10 > has > > a sensor proportioned to 8x10... or should I say proportioned to 32x40? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- ------------------------------------- regards, mehrdad