Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/04/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] In defence of the newspapers
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Thu Apr 10 07:13:40 2008
References: <20080409203333.2B88ABA1@resin15.mta.everyone.net> <46182EEF-D51F-4286-BB90-9BDF0C2FA07C@nathanfoto.com> <FDA45608-1F5A-4800-BAA4-FFB0DB7B1054@cox.net> <D424F7AA-3838-4C42-80A8-F062D7FB5A69@mindspring.com>
On Apr 10, 2008, at 5:12 AM, Ric Carter wrote:
> that's called the blog
that's right Ric...
the news according to....
reminds me of the old story about opinions being like ah's...
(almost) everybody has one...
Steve
> ric
>
>
> On Apr 10, 2008, at 1:03 AM, Steve Barbour wrote:
>> if the readers can supply the photos, maybe they can also supply
>> the news and editorial content,
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to:
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] WAS: Selling gear NOW: Free shooters. :-()
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] In defence of the newspapers)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] In defence of the newspapers)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] In defence of the newspapers)