Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/05/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica R-10 at Photokina 2008
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Wed May 7 23:50:45 2008
References: <050720082322.17500.4822399C0008E26B0000445C219791332903010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com> <92a2c1a4786d3f6c7b683419d8bd59ba@mail.nine.ch:993 ssl>

They may still be able to do that if the R lens were designed with a 
larger image circle to begin with. For example, I know for sure that 
the Summicron 50 R covers a good portion of the XPan frame.

Certainly, for argument sake, if the majority of the R lens cover a 
larger image circle than the 24x36 frame, then for them to release 
such a camera will be a good selling point. If the base price is at 
least $7000 (R9+DMR), then adding a few millimeters here and there in 
the sensor for another $1000 make sense.

May be they will have a selective image ratio builtin, dial for 2/3, 
4/3, square, XPan'ish etc. Sure people can crop in the end, but if 
that's the ideal solution, then everyone would be shooting square 
format in the first place :-)

At 11:28 PM 5/7/2008, Didier Ludwig wrote:

>No. 36x36 fills a larger circle than 24x36.
>Look this sketch I made once when the discussion was about the same topic:
>http://mogool.com/transfer/pythagoras.gif
>Didier
>
>
> > They could very easily go to a 36x36 and keep the current lenses.
> >
> > Gene

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, 
please use richard at imagecraft.com) 


Replies: Reply from leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Leica R-10 at Photokina 2008)
In reply to: Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com) ([Leica] Leica R-10 at Photokina 2008)
Message from leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Leica R-10 at Photokina 2008)