Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/07/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 50 Meg Kodak sensor - maybe this is what's happening behind the doors at Solms:
From: vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko)
Date: Wed Jul 16 07:21:07 2008

50 Meg Kodak sensor - maybe this is what's happening behind the doors at 
Solms:

http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/21088/?nlid=1211


  Pushing Pixels

Kodak's latest sensor enables digital cameras to enter the 50-megapixel 
range.

By Duncan Graham-Rowe

Last week, Kodak launched the first ever 50-megapixel camera sensor. 
While such high resolution goes beyond the needs of most consumers, for 
professional photographers the new sensor will enable photographs to be 
taken at an unprecedented level of detail.

For example, in a picture taken of a field one-and-a-half miles across, 
the sensor would make it possible for a viewer to detect an object 
measuring just one foot across.

This sort of resolution is only really essential for and targeted at 
high-end professional photography, in which high-quality images often 
need to be blown up large. But it could also be useful for some other 
applications, such as aerial photography as used for services like 
Google Earth. "The ability to have more pixels lets the plane fly 
higher, so you don't need as many pictures," says Mike DeLuca 
<http://michaeldeluca.pluggedin.kodak.com/>, marketing manager for Kodak 
<http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=2/6868&pq-locale=en_GB&_requestid=6900>'s
 
Image Sensor Solutions, based in Rochester, NY.

The sensor, which produces an array of 8,176-by-6,132 pixels, further 
closes the gap between traditional film and digital photography. "We're 
really close to how film was operated," DeLuca says. "It's very close." 
Now, he says, it's just a matter of the photographer's personal preference.

Normally, the smaller you make a pixel, the poorer the quality, says 
Albert Theuwissen <http://www.harvestimaging.com/index.php?id=1>, a 
digital-imaging expert and founder of Harvest Imaging, based in Bree, 
Belgium. "That is true for consumer as well as professional devices." 
DeLuca claims that in the case of Kodak's breakout sensor, new pigments 
actually increase the color quality rendered by the sensor, while other 
mechanisms enable the pixels to be just as sensitive as larger ones--and 
yet they're processed faster than in previous designs. What's more, he 
claims that the new sensor uses less power than its predecessors. "Every 
solution or step that makes the sensor faster and less power hungry is a 
step forward," says Theuwissen.

Kodak already has a sensor on the market with a resolution of 39 million 
pixels. But to further increase the resolution, the company had to not 
only reduce the size of each pixel from 6.8 microns to 6 microns, but 
also radically change the way that these charged coupled device (CCD) 
sensors work, says DeLuca.

"It's relatively straightforward to make the pixels smaller," he says. 
But because these devices comprise much more than just light-detecting 
elements, DeLuca says, they can suffer drops in performance if 
everything inside them is not shrunken along with the pixels.

"Each pixel has multiple structures," he says. Some are designed to pass 
a charge from one pixel to the next, to enable the image to be read off 
the device. Other structures ensure that any excess charge produced by 
bright lighting conditions doesn't spill out into neighboring pixels.

Another challenge is to maintain the dynamic range of the sensor--that 
is, its ability to detect light and dark simultaneously. In the sensor, 
this is basically a signal-to-noise issue, says DeLuca. "When you make 
the pixel smaller, there is less signal you are able to capture, because 
physically there is less ability to store electrons in that pixel. If we 
don't do anything else, what we end up with is a smaller signal with the 
same noise profile." To counteract this, Kodak has had to improve the 
amplifier at the output of the device, which reduces the noise.

Also, by increasing the number of pixels, it becomes more challenging to 
access the information once it has been detected. "Fifty million pixels 
is a lot of data 
<http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/21088/page2/#>," says DeLuca, 
," says DeLuca, and a photographer needs to be able to read it off the 
sensor in a reasonable amount of time.

Until now, Kodak has used a process that involved dumping the 
information from one row of pixels onto the next and shifting the 
information along the row, reading it off at the edge, one pixel at a 
time. This is a relatively slow process, normally carried out two rows 
at a time. So to cope with the additional amount of data, the new sensor 
comes with four output channels so that four times the amount of data 
can be read at once. This enables the sensor to increase the rate at 
which images can be captured from 0.9 to 1.0 frames a second, even 
though more information is being captured. And yet this also allows the 
clock cycle at which the data is read off to be reduced for each output, 
which further improves the signal-to-noise ratio.

Power savings are achieved by the way that the sensor is reset before 
each picture is taken. This is carried out just before a shot is taken 
to ensure that there is no residual charge or electrical noise in the 
pixels that could reduce the quality of the new image. In previous 
sensors, Kodak has simply read out each of the pixels row by row, as if 
collecting the data for a picture, but then it dumped the information 
instead of storing it. "What we've included now is a new structure in 
the pixel which allows all the pixels in the array to be cleared out in 
a single clock pulse," says DeLuca. So instead of having to flush the 
entire sensor row by row, you flush the entire array in one go, he says.

This dramatically improves the "click to capture" time--the delay 
between pressing the shutter down and the sensor capturing the image. 
"Instead of being milliseconds, it takes microseconds," says DeLuca. And 
in addition to saving time, it also reduces the power that is required 
to perform a reset.

This technology doesn't come cheap. The sensor alone will cost at least 
$3,500. But that doesn't appear to have put off one camera manufacturer. 
Hasselblad <http://www.hasselbladusa.com/promotions/50-promotion.aspx> 
has announced plans to launch a new camera featuring the sensor in the 
coming months. Nor is 50 megapixels going to remain on the cutting edge 
for long. Just this week, a few days after Kodak's announcement, another 
digital-imaging firm, DALSA <http://www.dalsa.com/>, based in Waterloo, 
Canada, announced that it has developed a 60-megapixel sensor.


Replies: Reply from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] 50 Meg Kodak sensor - maybe this is what's happening behindthe doors at Solms:)
Reply from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] 50 Meg Kodak sensor - maybe this is what's happening behind the doors at Solms:)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] 50 Meg Kodak sensor - maybe this is what's happening behind the doors at Solms:)