Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/07/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:Leica]Paris....Photos Illegal? Why?
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Wed Jul 16 16:21:12 2008
References: <1707A475-1148-4396-B25C-CA5D71D545A6@cox.net> <487CF95A.4090400@wanadoo.nl> <487D0651.3030409@san.rr.com> <C513CEC8-4978-4B20-8915-34D63BF8EDD7@pix-that-stimulate.com> <0DF01474-A333-4122-9C02-CBBE89EACAE9@cox.net> <8FBE6BFD-730A-47D6-ABF7-3616F9AF4B04@pix-that-stimulate.com> <487E7444.9000903@summaventures.com> <200807162235.ATN53510@rg4.comporium.net> <5f1fe1bbfc5190a4034ea0d93a40d7cf@woh.rr.com> <200807162312.ATN56334@rg4.comporium.net>

On Jul 16, 2008, at 4:12 PM, Tina Manley wrote:

> At 06:59 PM 7/16/2008, you wrote:
>> Wondering what some of you think about shooting pictures of people  
>> whose religion forbids being photographed (i.e., Amish)?  I  
>> struggle with this regularly as there are lots of Amish in Ohio and  
>> they live in such picturesque environments.  My personal approach  
>> has been to photograph their farms, buggies, etc. at will but not  
>> to photograph them from the front.  Usually, I just do grab shots  
>> from the car but never of them unless they don't see me (i.e., from  
>> behind, long tele, etc.).  Am I being too sensitive?
>>
>> Rob
>
> Rob-
>
> The Amish religion does not forbid being photographed.  The Amish  
> are particularly sensitive to being a tourist attraction and do  
> value their privacy.  Many photographers who have established a  
> relationship with the Amish people have published photos and books.   
> Just one example:
> http://amishphoto.com/   But he has spent 36 years photographing the  
> Amish and gaining their trust. I think that is totally different  
> from grab shots from a photographer who has no relationship with the  
> people.  Taking the time to develop a relationship makes all the  
> difference in the photos and their use.  If you make the effort to  
> meet the Amish and talk to them about their religion and society, I  
> would think they would be very welcoming to your photographing their  
> lives with sensitivity and not exploitation.  As a photojournalist,  
> not a paparazzi.  You are not being too sensitive and your instincts  
> are right.

I agree entirely with Tina's point of view and feelings. The issue  
reminds me of the Hopi people, who are private, sensitive, do not wish  
to be a tourst attraction or exploited...

but if you are a friend, and develop a relationship... they are very  
congenial, and not adverse to photopgraphs, except during religious  
ceremonies.


Steve


>
>
> Tina
>
> Tina Manley
> www.tinamanley.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Re:Leica]Paris....Photos Illegal? Why?)
In reply to: Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] flying in Paris....)
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] flying in Paris....)
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] Paris....Potos Illegal? Why?)
Message from tarek.charara at pix-that-stimulate.com (Tarek Charara) ([Leica] Paris....Potos Illegal? Why?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Re:Leica]Paris....Photos Illegal? Why?)
Message from tarek.charara at pix-that-stimulate.com (Tarek Charara) ([Leica] Re:Leica]Paris....Photos Illegal? Why?)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] Re:Leica]Paris....Photos Illegal? Why?)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re:Leica]Paris....Photos Illegal? Why?)
Message from rmcclure2 at woh.rr.com (Rob McClure) ([Leica] Re:Leica]Paris....Photos Illegal? Why?)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re:Leica]Paris....Photos Illegal? Why?)