Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Tree Details
From: glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer)
Date: Fri Sep 5 17:05:34 2008
References: <13D2585F1E644AE8AA70750C7ED9FBBA@jimnichols>

Jim,

YOUR trees on YOUR property are YOUR business.  I think it is 
impertinent for some people to complain.

You should not have to explain or justify what you did.

Jerry


Jim Nichols wrote:
> Several viewers commented on the "nice" tree that I recently removed from 
> my backyard.  While I don't usually want to burden the lists with details, 
> I don't want people to think I remove trees without good cause. The three 
> images below show the problems that caught me by surprise, and led to the 
> decision to remove the tree.
>
> The top of the tree, when viewed from ground level, did not appear to have 
> problems.  There were some dead lower branches that needed to be removed.  
> When the experienced tree surgeon viewed the upper fork from the bucket, 
> he found a serious weakness.
>
> >From the ground:
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Damaged+Fork.tif.html
>
> After cutting the damaged branch:
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Split+Branch.tif.html
>
> The upper portion of the trunk, as well as the base of the tree, were 
> hollow:
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Stump.tif.html
>
> Since it was close to the house, I feel safer now.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>   


Replies: Reply from jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Tree Details)
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Tree Details)
In reply to: Message from jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Tree Details)