Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I certainly agree with you - to a point. Yet, if we're talking about a "truly beautiful" print (not simply technical quality which is what the auto focus, auto exposure, auto technically accurate cameras produce) then it may be a subjective call as to "meaning." Fond regards, George george@imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Sep 7, 2008, at 8:35 PM, Tina Manley wrote: > But there is a danger of admiring a beautiful print of nothing. > The people who do that with digital prints are called "pixel > peepers". I attended a printing workshop with quite a few of them > who admired and examined with a loupe, beautifully printed photos > with no meaning behind them other than the technical quality. > > "There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept." -- > Ansel Adams