Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nathan's PAD 13/09/2008: fake or real?
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Sat Sep 13 23:04:11 2008

We paid the last visit of the season to our beach bar yesterday--they  
close down for the autumn today. Not that it was particularly autumnal  
yet:

http://www.greatpix.eu/gallery/4253606_netUM#372048818_2fQq4-O-LB

My 19-year old son and his visiting friend from England enjoyed  
playing with my E3, the 50-200mm zoom and the 1.4 extender. For some  
reason, it was mainly the long end that interested them ;-)

After looking at this picture, we debated the key question about  
whether these boobs were surgically enhanced or not, without reaching  
a clear conclusion. I think they are fake.

Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog




Replies: Reply from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 13/09/2008: fake or real?)
Reply from len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 13/09/2008: fake or real?)
Reply from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 13/09/2008: fake or real?)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 13/09/2008: fake or real?)
Reply from stasys1 at cox.net (stasys1@cox.net) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 13/09/2008: fake or real?)
Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 13/09/2008: fake or real?)