Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nathan's PAD 13/09/2008: fake or real?
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sun Sep 14 08:39:21 2008
References: <BC51B85B-B2BD-4ED7-9775-74C20ADE9B61@frozenlight.eu>

On Sep 13, 2008, at 11:03 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:

> We paid the last visit of the season to our beach bar yesterday-- 
> they close down for the autumn today. Not that it was particularly  
> autumnal yet:
>
> http://www.greatpix.eu/gallery/4253606_netUM#372048818_2fQq4-O-LB
>
> My 19-year old son and his visiting friend from England enjoyed  
> playing with my E3, the 50-200mm zoom and the 1.4 extender. For some  
> reason, it was mainly the long end that interested them ;-)
>
> After looking at this picture, we debated the key question about  
> whether these boobs were surgically enhanced or not, without  
> reaching a clear conclusion. I think they are fake.

just one...


I'll bet this works to increase the traffic, especially among plastic  
surgeons...


Steve
>
>
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>
> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 13/09/2008: fake or real?)