Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Scanning woes
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Thu Sep 18 11:53:08 2008

Too much wetting agent, Photoflo is a biggie.
And not squeegee it properly.
A quick go down with your first two fingers.



mark@rabinergroup.com
Mark William Rabiner



> From: Leonard Taupier <len-001@verizon.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:20:20 -0400
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Scanning woes
> 
> I use distilled water for everything except the final wash as well.
> My developer is always one shot but I reuse stopbath and fixer. I
> found the biggest offender to dirty negatives is used wetting agent.
> It stays on the negatives and doesn't get washed off. I find 3 or 4
> rolls through the PhoFlo is about it before the negatives get dirty.
> I never force dry negatives but run a humidifier in my darkroom in
> the winter. That keeps the dust down and helps curling, especially MF.
> 
> Len
> 
> On Sep 18, 2008, at 10:54 AM, David Rodgers wrote:
> 
>> Tina,
>> 
>> Haven't tried nose grease. Maybe I should :-). Kodak film cleaner
>> helps.
>> I still have a small amount. I don't think you can get it any more. I
>> wear gloves when I use it.  It helps with the dust, but not with
>> defects
>> in the neg caused by things like film that's been (high) temperatures
>> affected and bad water. I think water is my biggest issue. I
>> switched to
>> using distilled water for everything, except the final wash, and that
>> seems to have helped a lot.
>> 
>> When I lived in Portland I don't remember having issues with tap
>> water.
>> That's not the case where I live now. Also, my tap water this time of
>> year is always 70 deg F plus. So I have to adjust dev times. For years
>> my tap water was cool enough that I had no problem keeping
>> everything at
>> 68 deg F. While that doesn't sound like a big deal, it is. I'm finally
>> getting used to it.
>> 
>> Film is certainly not as clean as a digital capture image. I can
>> understand why people have given up on BW film. I can't seem to let it
>> go. It's like the weathered face of a cowboy who's been on the range
>> most of his days, vs the silky smooth cheeks of a beauty queen. It has
>> its own character.
>> 
>> DaveR
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tina Manley [mailto:images@comporium.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 5:35 PM
>> To: Leica Users Group
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Scanning woes
>> 
>> At 12:45 PM 9/17/2008, you wrote:
>>>  On the plus side, it's really
>>> make me take more care with all aspects of the film process.
>>> 
>>> DaveR
>> 
>> I wish I could go back in time and take them again. ;-)  I would use
>> refrigerated film, filtered water to mix developer, PhotoFlo and a
>> film dryer!  I would also take more care with focusing the camera
>> :-(  I have learned a little over the years but I'm working with what
>> I've got here.  I can get a lot more out of these poor old negatives
>> by scanning with Silverfast and  developing in Lightroom than I would
>> ever be able to get in the darkroom.  Does nose grease work with
>> scanned film?  I'll have to try that!
>> 
>> Tina
>> 
>> 
>> Tina Manley
>> www.tinamanley.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] Scanning woes)
In reply to: Message from len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Scanning woes)