Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/10/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Nathan, Pretty good quality, I've also appreciated that with Mac I obtain better quality on my scanned images, even so I never scann more than 2400 ppi, it makes a long time to scann and it eat so many disc space. But I want try your suggestion to scann slides, as you know the slides are my week point on scanning and I've never founded neither decided the good solution, probably the perfect doesn't exist, except to shot digital on color. Saludos cordiales Lluis El 25/10/2008, a las 12:25, Nathan Wajsman escribi?: > Occasionally, I put a roll in my Bronica 645 and go back to the > roots. I did that a couple of weeks ago, and got the processed film > back this week. Yesterday I finally had time to do the scanning and > Photoshopping. > > http://www.greatpix.eu/gallery/4253606_netUM#401847645_nW6wh-O-LB > > Incidentally, I used to scan MF film at a resolution of 3200 ppi on > my Epson V700. This time, just to test my iMac, I decided to go > whole hog, and scanned the film at the maximum optical resolution of > the scanner, i.e. 6400 ppi. This resulted in each image being about > 250 MB. I opened Photoshop CS3 and opened all 16 images at once. I > expected the thing to be slow as molasses, but no--I guess partly > thanks to having 4 GB of RAM, my iMac positively zipped through the > levels adjustments, spotting and sharpening that I did on each > image. Pretty impressive. > > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > > Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information