Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] R10 news
From: frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE)
Date: Sun Nov 2 07:23:08 2008

The only Hasselblad which would qualify would be if they made a back for the 
SWC. All the others you mention have the lens exit pupil plenty far enough 
away fron the image plane.


--- On Sun, 2/11/08, Frank Filippone <red735i@earthlink.net> wrote:

> From: Frank Filippone <red735i@earthlink.net>
> Subject: RE: [Leica] R10 news
> To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Sunday, 2 November, 2008, 2:41 PM
> Can you point to a technical discussion of why this is so? 
> I have only heard the Leica point of view.
> 
> It seems to me that if there were a good technical reason.,
> others would fool the path... Hasselblad, and third party
> esoteric camera backs for MF and larger studio camera 
> included....
> 
> But Leica, in the M8 only, is the only believer....... 
> 
> 
> Frank Filippone
> red735i@earthlink.net
> 
> 
> There is a perfectly sound technical reason for it to be
> better for the IR filter to be on "the other side"
> of the lens with rangefinder lenses. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> information


Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] R10 news)
In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] R10 news)