Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A REAL LEICA OR A COUNTERFEIT?
From: glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer)
Date: Sun Jan 11 14:03:48 2009
References: <6AF5A1EA-1953-41B2-AF9F-E5C4AACDEF1F@mac.com>

Robert and Ted

Don't any of you people realise that the 1936 Olympics were held in 
BERLIN, not Munich?

Jerry


Robert Rose wrote:
> Ted,
>
> Dennis Laney's book "Leica Collectors Guide" has an extensive listing 
> of serial numbers that might help.
>
> Serial number 10606 should correspond to a 1928 Leica I.
>
> The 1936 serial numbers range from around 183000 to 217500.
>
> Maybe the embossed cameras were a special edition with a different 
> serial number range?
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Bob Rose
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:16:07 -0800
> From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
> Subject: [Leica] A REAL LEICA OR A COUNTERFIT?
> To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Message-ID: <79pc8o$1r6qik@pd6mo1no-svcs.prod.shaw.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="US-ASCII"
>
> Hi crew,
>
> This note with a question from my son Scott this evening:
>
>
>
> Scott asked:
>
>>> I was over at a friends place tonight and he has an old Leica that 
>>> he had
> bought off this old Russian guy a couple of years back, on the top of the
> camera it has embossed 1936 Munich Olympic, has the German bird crest and
> the serial number 10606.
>
>
>
> The question is, do you know anyone in the LUG that may be able to 
> tell or
> trace the serial number and find out if it's the real deal or a knock 
> off.
> The camera is in really good shape. <<<<<,
>
>
>
> There you go folks that's the question.
>
> I looked in a few real old Leica books but couldn't find any serial 
> number
> information.
>
>
>
> Anyone out there like to take a shot at answering Scott's question?
>
>
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> ted
>
> _______________________________________________
> L
 

Replies: Reply from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] A REAL LEICA OR A COUNTERFEIT?)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] A REAL LEICA OR A COUNTERFEIT?)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] A REAL LEICA OR A COUNTERFEIT?)
In reply to: Message from robert.rose at mac.com (Robert Rose) ([Leica] A REAL LEICA OR A COUNTERFEIT?)