Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/01/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Erwin reviews new Summilux
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Fri Jan 30 17:05:41 2009
References: <9b678e0901290644o695e0ae1ka50c5fd18f2eda52@mail.gmail.com> <C5A8D702.492F6%mark@rabinergroup.com> <7ac27f4f0901301403p7fc91e67jb550958d09f153df@mail.gmail.com> <CB70BDC2-B649-4764-B1A7-213609F21014@mac.com> <7ac27f4f0901301501l4191d042p1cb206cd90edfe30@mail.gmail.com> <36172e5a0901301614k56a407d4u74d253def9b9286c@mail.gmail.com>
I didn't say there's anything wrong :-)
If I have the budget, I would be all over the 0.95 Noct and the 21/24 'lux
:-)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew@gmail.com>wrote:
> The pedestrian Summilux 50 f/1.4 ASPH. !!!!!
> As far as people wanting the best because they can,... sorry I'm struggling
> to see the difficulty ;-)
>
--
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// b: http://rfman.wordpress.com
Replies:
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Erwin reviews new Summilux)
In reply to:
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Erwin reviews new Summiluxes)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Erwin reviews new Summilux)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Erwin reviews new Summilux)
Message from tcharara at mac.com (Tarek Charara) ([Leica] Erwin reviews new Summilux)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Erwin reviews new Summilux)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Erwin reviews new Summilux)