Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/03/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Bokeh?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:29:18 -0500
References: <164318387.21627421237389647350.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu> <200903181606.BNJ07207@rg5.comporium.net> <6.2.1.2.2.20090318133758.02db35d0@pop.med.cornell.edu> <200903181756.BLX05968@rg4.comporium.net> <D7D744C2-80B6-490E-9D44-EA178245F775@mac.com> <200903182024.BLY15315@rg4.comporium.net>
well poke it out the window
under similar circumstances
light through the trees - whatever
we're dying to know the culprit
now that you've showed us
the damage
;~)
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
On Mar 18, 2009, at 3:24 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
> The 135 that I carried is the Hektor - 135/4.5 I bought it to use
> with the Visoflex and M8. I had never used it as a normal lens so
> I guess it's possible the awful bokeh is the fault of the Hektor!
> I don't remember using it that day, but I guess it's possible
> (although I would think that the shallow depth of field would be an
> indication that it was a faster lens?)
In reply to:
Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] IMG: Bokeh?)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Bokeh?)
Message from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] IMG: Bokeh?)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Bokeh?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Bokeh?)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Bokeh?)